For a long time the Government has been holding the production of GM food at bay, but now, with rising food prices, it seems this is looking like a possible solution to increase food production.
Mark Wyatt, of KCR, said: "It is an intensive way of producing food, but the quality and the lack of risk is not yet proven. It is not natural. I do not agree with it, as we should be living with nature, not messing around with it."

We believe that there should be no dependence on other countries for energy supplies and to this end when North Sea gas runs out we see the end of mains domestic gas in this country. We should not import gas via countries which are politically volatile.
We do not agree with the Government who are advocating that vast numbers of wind farms need to be sited all over our beautiful countryside. We believe there is a role for wind farms but they should be sited off shore and they could be used to generate energy from wave current and tidal power at the same time as wind power.
Our main source of future energy must come from a new wave of nuclear power stations. The second major source of energy should come from the water which surrounds us. It is not difficult to extract hydrogen from water. We have had the technology for nearly one hundred years and are not likely to drain the North Sea and the Atlantic! Nuclear and hydrogen are both clean fuels and we now have a third clean fuel source, thanks to advanced technology, which is from coal, which we have in abundance. The next source of future energy should come from harnessing wave tidal and current power in conjunction with offshore wind farms.
With these four being the main generators of our energy needs in the next 10 years or so we can then also benefit from projects such as the Severn River Barrage, use of solar power and the use of geo-thermal power.
We believe these sources provide environmentally sustainable solutions to our future energy needs. As well as keeping the generation of energy to ourselves we would also suggest that all companies involved in the production of our energy be renationalised and brought back into public ownership.
Apart from this making economic sense it also provides a good safety factor.

This is a subject we have commented on many times, but is back in the news locally as Shepway Friends of the Earth have recently held a protest about over packaging at the Asda supermarket in Folkestone.
Mark Wyatt, of KCR, said: "Much food is over-packaged. Supermarkets try to blame the manufacturers but much of what they sell is own brand, so they do have a lot of control over this."
There is a worrying trend towards supermarkets using Tetra-Paks at the moment, rather than steel food tins, for a range of goods. This is because supermarkets can get more square packets on a shelf, than circular tins. However, steel tins can be recycled and the Tetra-Paks cannot, as they are made of a combination of plastic, aluminium and cardboard.
Mark said: "People need to realise they pay for packaging. According to experts each household spends about £8 a week on packaging, or around £400 a year. Packaging has changed over the last few decades into a massive marketing machine rather than something which allows goods to be transported in a useable condition. But until supermarkets see a slow-down in their tills they will not do anything about this." A recent article in the Daily Mail revealed how much packaging there is on a range of everyday items at various supermarkets. They found three peppers came with 3g of packaging, a 400g tub of strawberries included 27g of packaging, 500g of minced beef had 28g of packaging and 250g of fresh salmon had 43g of packaging.